There is so much wrong with this Canadian/French tale of genetically engineered frolics that it's surprising how enjoyable the experience ends up. I'd go as far as saying that it's the most engaging film I've watched this year, but I'm not sure it's the best.
Let's start with the downside. The two lead actors Sarah Polley (Dawn of the Dead) and Adrien Brody (The Pianist) are both awful, which is a surprise really as they are both cracking actors. They do an amazing job of combining awkwardness, woodenness, gawkiness and bad fashion in the creation of the superstar scientist couple, Elasa and Clive. The script is equally suspect as everything happens so quickly it defies belief; it's like the genetic engineering equivalent of 20-20 cricket. Then halfway through the film we get thrown Elsa's back-story and this seems to accelerate the progression of events even further. Clive has a hell of a lot of explaining to do with his antics and he doesn't even have a back-story to bail him out! To be fair it would have taken a good two and a half hours to do the story justice and the budget was just not there for that level of indulgence.
But what makes it such a good film then? As Natali says repeatedly on the extras, it is a film that had to be made. That passion, enthusiasm and vision shines through despite all the problems, most of which were caused by the lack of budget I'm guessing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42afc/42afc6e20847ce203eb208bb84fa70dae5eedcee" alt=""
All in all it's great fun, and the bad acting and weaknesses in the plot can easily be forgiven in light of Natali's determination and ambition. It's a work of flawed genius, but definitely worth a watch.
8/10
Doccortex
Doccortex
If you like this you could also try:
Cube, Creep, Mimic.
No comments:
Post a Comment