Showing posts with label Ladies' Night Season. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ladies' Night Season. Show all posts

Friday, 6 June 2014

Feature - Battle of the Seasons Update


It's time to see how well the ladies have done as we pit the Ladies' Night Season against all of our other pleasant seasons.

12. The Luc Besson Season = 2 (Average rating for the entire season)



11. The Musical Season = 3.2



10. The Sword and Sorcery Season = 4.4



9. The 80s Prison Season = 4.6



8. Year of the Dead = 5.3





6. The Gritty Season = 6.4





4. The Buddy Movie Season = 7



3. The Mark Dacascos Season = 7 



2. The Christmas Season = 7.3



1. The Fog Season = 8



(The Mark Dacascos Season is placed above The Buddy Movie Season due to it having five films in it, compared to The Buddy's three.)

Mid-table obscurity beckons for our ladies with an average score of only 5.4. Nothing to challenge either The Fog Season at the top of the table or lovely Luc Besson who will surely be propping up the bottom of the table for the rest of time. Not sure what the next season is going to be yet but I've got a few ideas...


evlkeith

Tuesday, 3 June 2014

Review - Alyce (2011 - Dir. Jay Lee)



(Alas, Doccortex's Ladies' Night Season draws to an end with this final review. As a treat lets have a bit of live Kool & the Gang. "C'mon fellas, let's salute the girls." - evlkeith)



To complete our Ladies’ Night season, it’s the scuzzy, splatter filled charms of Alyce. If it wasn’t so grubby and unhygienic it could almost be gritty, but sadly the hallmarks of the horror genre are always subtly present (what do you mean, "sadly"?). It’s all very dark and grimy, like some 1980’s VHS stalwart from the cobweb infested shelves of Creepy’s Video Emporium, with plenty of drug taking, dodgy night clubs, gangsters and amateur prostitution. For more wholesome amateur prostitution see Belle de Jour. But with all this grizzly unpleasantness, is it actually any good?



Well surprisingly enough, it’s a little old school treat. The first three quarters of the film deals with the fallout from our heroine, Alyce, (Jade Dornfeld) ‘accidentally’ pushing her best friend from the roof of a tall building. She descends into a decreasing spiral of mental illness, drug use and general sleeziness and throughout this process, Dornfeld’s acting is always believable, natural and suitably detached. In the last quarter the whole thing explodes into a mini splatter fest, which is funny but borders on full scale slapstick, which is certainly not to everyone’s taste.



It’s the atmosphere that elevates the film from oddity to enjoyable oddity. There’s a real sense that the story is taking place in society’s dark underbelly in the depraved eighties and the whole thing has been made with the express purpose of being released straight to video. You feel like you’re watching something from a bygone age, but in a really good way.




I doubt it’s to everyone’s taste, but with a certain amount of low expectations, it’s well worth a watch. Possibly best watched late at night on your oldest TV set with a couple of Soda Stream orange squashes, over fizzed of course.

6/10
Doccortex

If you like this you could also try:
Excision, Belle de Jour.



Saturday, 29 March 2014

Review - Run Lola Run (1998 - Dir. Tom Tykwer)



(To increase your enjoyment by a factor of 2.35 when reading this review have a listen to a lovely bit of Kool & the Gang - evlkeith.)



This is a low key German offering with the faint aroma of Groundhog Day permeating its soul. Lola (Franka Potente) must run to save her dodgy boyfriend Manni (Moritz Bleibtreu) from certain death, after gormlessly leaving a gangster’s substantial wedge of drug money on the tube. Why she bothers to save him I have no idea, because she could seriously do better, but she tries anyway. Over three distinct episodes she tries, tries and tries again, each time making subtle differences to each separate reality.





It’s well made and relatively enjoyable, but it leaves you mysteriously unsatisfied. Obviously there’s lots of frantic running from Lola as she dashes about breaking the laws of time and space. This is fine, but her outfit is woefully inappropriate for the task and you really want her to get changed into some gym kit for her subsequent outings. Sadly this never enters her head and the horrible tattoo around her belly button doesn’t help matters. The sub-plot of her father’s mysterious relationship is a welcome and interesting embellishment, but it’s unfortunately only short respite from the breathless pounding of those streets.





It’s cleverly plotted to an extent, but there’s little of the time travelling wow factor of Timecrimes or even Harry Potter and Prisoner of Azkaban. It’s a clinical but underwhelming experience, and this isn’t helped by the superficial main characters who are neither likeable or particularly nasty. In the end we are left ambivalent to their fate(s) as the film performs like a mid table Bundesliga team; efficient yet without the creativity to climb the table.



It’s not a terrible film, but it falls under the most damning of categories; somewhere between faint praise and mildly annoying. Yes it’s mediocre! It neither offends nor enlightens. Watch with limited expectations at best.

3/10 
Doccortex

If you like this you could also try:
Good Bye Lenin, The Lives of Others.


Sunday, 23 February 2014

Review - Belle de Jour (1967 - Dir. Luis Bunuel)




(Again seeing as though it's Ladies' Night feel free to play a bit of Kool & the Gang as you read this lovely review by Doccortex - evlkeith)


Catherine Deneuve is the titular Belle de Jour and she has a whole range of marital problems. At the top of the list is the fact that she keeps drifting off into a Mills and Boone fantasy world with whips and chains thrown in for good measure and the Velvet Underground’s ‘Venus in Furs’ playing in the background. Husband, Jean Sorel, although French, doesn’t look the most understanding of types.



Unlike most bored married people in Britain, Séverine doesn’t go to bingo, take up darts or go down to the allotments. Instead she takes up the unusual hobby of prostitution. But sneakily, only in the daytime, so she can be there to cook husband Pierre’s tea in the evening. This seems a tad extreme, but surprisingly, it all goes swimmingly for a while as Severine gets all the seedy action she so desires, but also gets paid into the bargain (a hell of a lot more than writing an obscure film blog I might add.) Obviously it can’t last and things start to get a little awkward in the second half of the film.




The film is all about Deneuve and Bunuel’s infatuation with her, (and often her feet). She is distant, aloof and it has to be said, wooden for most of the film. Only in the latter conflict stages does she come to life and show any signs of life, let alone passion. She is the epitome of French cool and I have no doubts it was the director’s intention to portray her in this ethereal trance state, rather than any slight on Deneuve’s acting. She’s iconic and beautiful, but is too pampered and stylised by Bunuel to be anywhere near likeable or attractive. Consequently, we have no sympathy for her demise and are left with tired apathy. And I had a little chuckle to myself when it all went pear shaped too.



It’s supposedly a classic, and to be fair it’s never less than enjoyable, but if it were made today it would be shown on the Movies for Men channel on Sky. And although that sounds a bit racy, I can assure you it isn’t. If odd, French melodramas are your thing, then this will be perfect, the rest of us may be more circumspect however.

4/10
Doccortex

If you like this you could also try:
Viridiana, That Obscure Object of Desire.



Tuesday, 4 February 2014

Review - 4321 (2010 - Dir. Noel Clarke)



(Again seeing as though it's Ladies' Night feel free to play a bit of Kool & the Gang as you read this lovely review by Doccortex - evlkeith)


The cover looks impressive in an urban, gritty, glamorous kind of way. 4 girls, 3 days, 2 cities,1 chance. Sounds intriguing enough. It’s billed as 2010’s best British film from a BAFTA award winning director. What could possibly go wrong?


Let’s get all the negatives out of the way first shall we? It turns out that the writer/director is that guy out of Doctor Who. He was annoying as the Doctor’s sidekick and he manages to make an equally annoying film. The fake urban-ness is almost too much to take and the street gangster types come across like the opening five minutes of Attack the Block, but with no like-ability factor. Do people actually talk like this? In South Yorkshire we all have the same accent, which admittedly makes us sound like the unintelligent cousin of the Dingles from Emmerdale, but it’s got to be better than that fake urban street talk innit?



Another problem is that although the film represents the four lead characters as strong, positive female role models, the whole thing descends into cartoony sub-Spice Girl power. Women can be strong in other ways than being able to beat up guys with limited kung fu skills. The recurring nightmare who is Michelle Ryan returns to spoil proceedings with some more wooden, annoying, stereotypical strong cockney woman acting, but this time with some obligatory limited Kung Fu moves.

The plot is so preposterous that a five year old would probably despair at the diamond heist tomfoolery and the general stupidity of the characters, let alone a safe in a super market cereal aisle!


It’s looking like we’re headed for a 0/10, but fear not! Somehow Clarke and Davis manage to snatch a victory from the gaping jaws of Luc Besson.

The film is told in four equal segments with one of the girls taking the lead in each section. We follow their personal story through the three days and each story is relatively engaging, but the clever part is how the full story is revealed bit by bit as each act is played out. As we view events from each individual point of view things start to mesh together and events that puzzled us earlier are explained. It’s intelligent and clever film making, and despite all the annoyances at the periphery, the film comes over as something really original even if you possibly have to be a teenager to enjoy it to its fullest effect.



The four leads all put in a decent acting shift with Shanika Warren-Markland (Kerrys) annoying but tough, and Tamsin Egerton (Cassandra) annoying and posh. Emma Roberts (Joanne) (Wild Child again!) is surprisingly believable as the gutsy American, but best of all is the depressed graffiti artist Shannon, played by Ophelia Lovibond. She’s introverted, vulnerable and is the only reason I watched for the first half hour.

It’s a mixed bag, but it’s well intended, entertaining and original. I’d watch it again just for all those little subtleties. Surprisingly positive and not bad for 99p.
6/10 
Doccortex

If you like this you could also try:
Adulthood, Kidulthood, Life and Lyrics.




Monday, 6 January 2014

Review - Volver (2006 - Dir. Pedro Almodóvar)





(After the runaway success of the Motivational Growth review with its own chiptune soundtrack, Doccortex has decided to base a whole season on a song. So feel free to listen to this lovely song as you read - evlkeith)


In our Ladies' Night Season we examine a selection of films with strong female leads. Surely it can't be any worse than The Luc Besson Season (It'd have to be going some - evlkeith). We kick off with the highly enjoyable Volver...

Occasionally a film brings to life a location with such vividness and realism that you feel absorbed into the setting. Volver’s representation of the superstitious little village of Alcanfor de las Infantas and surrounding area is one of those moments. You want to return and live there long after the film has finished, such is the warmth, emotion and detail that is generated. And although not situated in the village, you want to share a meal at Raimunda’s restaurant and listen her sing.




It’s also one of those films when not much happens. Okay, there’s death, illness and people return from the dead, but ultimately the film is about the characters and how they celebrate all the intricacies of life. The line between the living and the dead is blurred in an intelligent way and although the themes are melancholy the film somehow manages to produce a joyous festival of what it means to be alive.




I’d never really noticed Penelope Cruz before apart from her supporting role in Vicky Christina Barcelona. In Volver however, she is incredible, and the best way to describe her performance has already been used in the IMDb review by Rene; she is ‘a force of nature.’ She’s strong, beautiful, passionate and believable, as the suddenly widowed Raimunda.




The rest of the all female leads are equally natural, with Carmen Maura’s ‘Irene’ and Lola Duenas’ ‘Sole’ both worthy of special note. Only Blanca Portillo breaks the illusion of real life with a slightly over the top performance as the spooky ‘returning’ mother, who looks crazed and disturbed in equal measure.


It’s great fun and a quality film, and it somehow manages to avoid classification in any of the tired old genre slots. If you fancy a trip to rural Spain, avoid all the heat and the hassle, just watch Volver instead.

8/10 
Doccortex

If you like this you could also try:
All About my Mother, The Sea Inside, Open Your Eyes.